Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): Carolean Age- A New Dawn
Editorial

The Peculiar Case of GMC vs Pandian: Is an Apology admissible as an Admission of Guilt?

PDF
  • Indranil Chakravorty
DOI: https://doi.org/10.38192/15.2.9

Published 2023-06-04

Keywords

  • Probity,
  • Professionalism,
  • Apology,
  • Admission of Guilt,
  • MPTS

How to Cite

Chakravorty, I. (2023). The Peculiar Case of GMC vs Pandian: Is an Apology admissible as an Admission of Guilt?. Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.38192/15.2.9

Copyright (c) 2022 Indranil Chakravorty

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This editorial reviews the recent judgement by the MPTS of Dr Pandian's apology for distress caused as an admission of guilt in a peculiar scenario where contemporaneous notes made of an examination by Dr Pandian were discounted in favour of a recall by a patient of the event- of whether a physical examination had occurred. The punitive sanction by the MPTS appears to have gone against the regulator's guidance to professionals following the Duty of Candour regulation of 2014, amending the Health & Social Care Act 2008.

The editorial reviews the construct of honesty, the prevalence of dishonesty in the profession and whether recall bias may have influenced the scenario. The background of institutional racism against minority communities believed by many in the profession to exist in the health service and the actions of the regulator are also considered in this case.

PDF

References

  1. References
  2. The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2014/9780111117613/contents (accessed 4 Jun 2023).
  3. Openness and honesty when things go wrong: The professional duty of candour. https://www.gmc-uk.org/ethical-guidance/ethical-guidance-for-doctors/candour---openness-and-honesty-when-things-go-wrong (accessed 4 Jun 2023).
  4. Fred HL. Dishonesty in Medicine Revisited. Tex Heart Inst J 2008;35:6–15.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2322888/ (accessed 4 Jun 2023).
  5. Kusnoor AV, Falik R. Cheating in medical school: the unacknowledged ailment. South Med J 2013;106:479–83. doi:10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3182a14388
  6. Sierles F, Hendrickx I, Circle S. Cheating in medical school. Academic Medicine 1980;55:124.https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Abstract/1980/02000/Cheating_in_medical_school.6.aspx (accessed 4 Jun 2023).
  7. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med 2005;353:2673–82. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa052596
  8. Wachter RM. Personal accountability in healthcare: searching for the right balance. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:176–80. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001227
  9. Aveling E-L, Parker M, Dixon-Woods M. What is the role of individual accountability in patient safety? A multi-site ethnographic study. Sociol Health Illn 2016;38:216–32. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12370
  10. Bond CF, DePaulo BM. Accuracy of deception judgments. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2006;10:214–34. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
  11. Hartwig M, Bond CF. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychol Bull 2011;137:643–59. doi:10.1037/a0023589
  12. Iacobucci G. The BMJ Interview: Victor Adebowale on systemic racism in the NHS. BMJ 2020;371:m4111. doi:10.1136/bmj.m4111
  13. Robinson-Lane SG, Patel RV. The imperative to address institutional racism in nursing practice. Nurs Outlook 2022;70:691–3. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2022.06.001
  14. Lloyd EP, Hugenberg K, McConnell AR, et al. Black and White Lies: Race-Based Biases in Deception Judgments. Psychol Sci 2017;28:1125–36. doi:10.1177/0956797617705399
  15. julietwalker. Racism and the General Medical Council. The BMJ. 2021.https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/06/29/racism-and-the-general-medical-council/ (accessed 4 Jun 2023).
  16. Lind S. GMC data lays bare stark racial inequalities in medical training. Pulse Today. 2023.https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/regulation/gmc-data-lays-bare-stark-racial-inequalities-in-medical-training/ (accessed 4 Jun 2023).
  17. Althubaiti A. Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016;9:211–7. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S104807
  18. Berlin L. Medical errors, malpractice, and defensive medicine: an ill-fated triad. Diagnosis (Berl) 2017;4:133–9. doi:10.1515/dx-2017-0007
  19. http://disputeresolutionblog.practicallaw.com/author/practical-law-dispute-resolution. Sorry, not sorry… the case for an apology law in UK dispute resolution (Part 1). Dispute Resolution blog. 2021.http://disputeresolutionblog.practicallaw.com/sorry-not-sorry-the-case-for-an-apology-law-in-uk-dispute-resolution-part-1/ (accessed 4 Jun 2023).
  20. Bell SK, Delbanco T, Anderson-Shaw L, et al. Accountability for medical error: moving beyond blame to advocacy. Chest 2011;140:519–26. doi:10.1378/chest.10-2533

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >>