Why is standing up for women’s equality still relevant in 2021?

Main Article Content

Subarna Chakravorty MBBS MRCPCH PhD FRCPath FRCP

Abstract

It is 2021. The world is reeling from the ravages of a merciless pandemic that knew no borders and killed at will. When scientific collaboration, market forces and societal will resulted in the creation, testing, approval and deployment of multiple vaccines that may yet stop the virus in its tracks. Where most were forced to live apart, and yet joined up like never before.


And yet, it has been a year where the privileges of a few were starkly overshadowed by the destitution of many. A year where inherent societal inequalities in many nations were held in sharp focus. Where the poor and disadvantaged were much more likely to be infected and die of the virus, and where untreated premorbid conditions hastened their demise. Many governments used the necessary restrictions of civil liberties to their advantage, and many congregated to protest.


Where do women feature in this? The author explores the impact of inequalities on women and why women do need to stand up for equality and justice, now more than ever before. 

Article Details

How to Cite
Chakravorty, S. (2021). Why is standing up for women’s equality still relevant in 2021?. Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion, 14(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.38192/14.1.15
Section
Opinions
Author Biography

Subarna Chakravorty MBBS MRCPCH PhD FRCPath FRCP, Kings College Hospital, London, UK

Consultant Paediatric Haematologist

Joint Secretary, Bapio Institute for Health Research, Bedford, UK

References

1. Lane R. Sarah Gilbert: carving a path towards a COVID-19 vaccine. Lancet. 2020;395(10232):1247.
2. Garikipati S, Sambhampati, U. Leading the Fight Against the Pandemic: Does Gender ‘Really’ Matter? Social Science Research Network. 2021.
3. Xue B, McMunn A. Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK Covid-19 lockdown. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0247959.
4. Gabster BP, van Daalen K, Dhatt R, Barry M. Challenges for the female academic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2020;395(10242):1968-70.
5. Alon T, Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. . The shecession (she-recession) of 2020: Causes and consequences. VOXEU. 2020.
6. All-Party Parliamentary Group on Baby Loss. COVID-19 and its Impact on Pregnancy and Baby Loss. United Kingdom; 2020.
7. COVID-19 is reversing the important gains made over the last decade for women in the workforce - PwC Women in Work Index [press release]. pwc.com2021.
8. Dash A. Engenderings [Internet]: London School of Economics and Political Sciences. 2021. [cited 2021]. Available from: https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/gender/2020/11/26/the-impact-of-the-pandemic-on-refugee-women-and-girls/.
9. Smith SG ZX, Basile KC, et al.,. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief — updated release. In: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control CfDCaP, editor. 2015.
10. Evans ML, Lindauer M, Farrell ME. A Pandemic within a Pandemic - Intimate Partner Violence during Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(24):2302-4.
11. Zucker I, Prendergast BJ. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women. Biol Sex Differ. 2020;11(1):32.
12. Torjesen I. Covid-19: Middle aged women face greater risk of debilitating long term symptoms. BMJ. 2021;372:n829.
13. UN Women. Visualizing the data: Women’s representation in society 2020 [Available from: https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/multimedia/2020/2/infographic-visualizing-the-data-womens-representation.
14. O’Reily M. WHY WOMEN? Inclusive Security and Peaceful Societies. https://www.inclusivesecurity.org/: Inclusive Security 2015.
15. Terjesen S, Barbosa Couto, E., Morais Francisco, P. Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management and Governance 2015.
16. Moreno J, Shaw, D. Women’s empowerment following disaster: a longitudinal study of social change. Natural Hazards. 2018;92:205-24.
17. Chattopadhyay R, Duflo, E. Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. conometrica. 2004;72(5):1409-43.
18. Bratton KA, Ray, L.P. Descriptive representation: Policy outcomes and municipal day-care coverage in Norway. American Journal of Political Science 2002;46(2):428-37.
19. Storvik A, Teigen, M. Women on Board The Norwegian Experience. Friedrich Ebert Foundation (Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung); 2010.
20. Beaman L, Chattopadhyay,R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., Topalova, P. Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science. 2012;335(6068):582-6.
21. Kennedy H. The Royal College –Our Professional Home. An independent review on diversity and inclusion
for the Royal College of Surgeons of England. An exciting call for radical change. The Royal College of Surgeons, London; 2021.

Most read articles by the same author(s)